
I must be missing something here, because everybody who has written a review about this movie so far seems to think it was pretty damned good.
I remember seeing the trailer and reading various things about the plot of Yellowbrickroad last year, and being extremely geeked to get a chance, any chance to see it. The idea of an entire town disappearing (ala the colony at Roanoke, NC) and years alter a group of curious filmmakers willing to take the same trip down the Yellow Brick Road to find out what happened, was fantastic.
The movie, as it turns out, was not.
Many reviewers have called this movie "a slow burn" which I don't agree with, mainly because there is no burn. It's slow, yes. No burn though. It felt uneven and directionless, like they had no idea where to go with this awesome premise and set up. From the advance buzz I read about YBR, I was expecting a tense, atmospheric creeper, and to be totally honest, aside from one or two scenes, there wasn't much creepy in this movie at all.
The acting was decent, though some of the characters were a bit annoying at times, but if felt as if I was watching a bunch of actors pretending to go insane rather than characters losing their grips on reality. Some of it was even goofy.
The part in which a girl just walks of a cliff made me giggle; they must have sped up the film during her fall, because it was so fast that I couldn't help but laugh and say "what?!?" Then again the fact that the characters just kinda stood around and watch a guy bash a chicks leg off with a rock -and did nothing- was nearly laughable as well. Like how long does it take to bash through someone's leg with a rock? A while, right? And no one ran over to stop him until he had removed the leg?
There's also a rather jarring sequence about midway through the movie that grated on my nerves. Music flared on and off while they cast stumbled around like the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise during a Klingon attack, and I'm talking 70's William Shatner-style here... it was kinda funny. It felt like the scene went on and on too, so much that it elicited a cheer when it finally ended.

I'll give credit for a few things, such as the sound mix/editing. The filmmakers made some bold moves involving sound in this one, to the point where it almost became it's own character in a way. Aside from the majorly annoying "on/off scene", the sound was used to great effect. There's also a scene where a guy is hiding in a little cave... that was pretty good too. There are some good things at work here, mainly sound, location and premise, they're just never really used to any good effect, that's the real problem. The director and writer never really make us feel dread or any sort of impending doom for the characters as they make their way further and further down the road, towards whatever waits at its end.
I really just don't get it. The movie was slow, uneventful, and tediously frustrating. Walk, talk, sleep, act odd, repeat. And there was nothing even close to a payoff at the end. Oh yeah, we didn't mention the ending, did we? I wont spoil anything by going into any sort of detail, but I will say that horror filmmakers need to stop being afraid to film endings for their films. Enough with the twists and/or complete ambiguity, let's have at least a little bit of resolution or at the very least, some explanation somewhere in there.
Even if there's no "payoff" to be had at the end, how about make the rest of the movie gripping and absorbing? I kept waiting for to tense up, and feel some doom creep into my bones, but that moment never came. 1940's music and melodramatic over-acing are bad enough, but when they're the centerpiece of a movie and are counted on to raise the tension /atmosphere levels with absolutely nothing else to help them, it's a tough sell.

D+ It's not an awful movie, it just really drops the ball in the important areas, which makes it awful enough to us. Like I said earlier, it seems as if most horror sites seem tho think this movie an uber-effective triumph of independent horror cinema. Aside from the ones that usually seem to be shills for certain movies/filmmakers, maybe they saw a completely different cut than we did? We really wanted to love this movie, but if we said it was loveable, we'd be lying.
*And before some jerk-off leaves us a clever comment like "You just don't appreciate the slow burn" or "You need everything spoon fed to you!", I loved the TV show Rubicon. If there's anything that spoon feeds less or that burns slower than that, I have yet to see it. It got cancelled because nothing really ever happened on that show, and I thought it was brilliant. So no, we in no way prefer style over substance, and in fact we will take substance every time. This movie just fell short.
9 comments:
In life it is believed that there are more questions than answers.One such answerless question would be what the hell is this film about??
I thought some of the cinematography was good and the music and sound editing were pretty cool,however it doesn't make the film.
The only thing I can think of is that the director/writer wanted to experiment with an idea and run with it.
ah well,maybe the next one will make more sense.
i totally agree i just finished watching and i'm just confussed,i have know idea what they were trying to acomplish,it was just bizzare.
I seriously enjoyed reading your review. More than the movie, in fact. And I've written something myself in a different review about filmmakers taking the easy way out and just not having an ending. It's a cop out. Thank you for breaking it down so eloquently and if you happen to have some sort of explanation for this one, I'm still looking...
I wish I knew, Justine.
I think it comes down to people trying to be clever and creative, rather than making a clever and creative movie.
I also think that a lot of filmmakers have no clue how to end a movie, and so they just leave it "open to interpretation."
he's right. No payoff whatsoever. There's no " well... It made sense if you watched carefully, " or " it was obscure, but there" No there was NOTHING. NO EXPLANATION AT ALL! NOTHING!
I thought this movie was interesting. Lacked in certain areas, but I could see how great it could've been. I love to see horror movies . deviate from the constant hack and slash. Like blair witch project, just without a first person camera. Plus slowly being tortured into insanity by that music is kind of scary thought
Yeah, Anon, I do have to say that Yellowbrickroad was at least different. The premise had us excited since the first time we heard about it, it's just that the movie really didn't do much for the premise at all.
It was an okay movie. Of course once it ended I couldn't help wonder what it was actually supposed to be about
It was a great concept movie with some great ideas but ultimately unsuccessful in being unable to completely follow through on those ideas.
As someone who loves ambiguous endings I don't mind endings like the one in YBR but after several viewings the ending smacks more of "lazy" than ingenious.
I'm glad I watched this film, but I think it would have been a more satisfying view had the films creators included fuller realizations and a bit more specificity
In it's ending. Nice first effort ,I guess.
Post a Comment